PDF (Uzbek)

Keywords

ore deposits in mountainous regions
open–underground mining
open-pit field
reserves beyond the open-pit contour
access schemes
shaft
side (pit wall) reserves

How to Cite

JUSTIFICATION OF OPTIONS FOR THE SYSTEM OF OPENING UP CONTOUR RESERVES IN OPEN-PIT AND UNDERGROUND DEVELOPMENT OF ORE DEPOSITS IN MOUNTAIN AREAS. (2026). Mining Bulletin of Uzbekistan, 1(104), 35-39. https://journal.nsumt.uz/academy/index.php/MBU/article/view/73

Abstract

The paper addresses the issues of improving the efficiency of ore deposit development in mountainous regions by substantiating options for accessing contour reserves under open–underground mining conditions. The relevance of the study is driven by the need to involve reserves located beyond the open-pit con-tour in mining under increasingly complex mining and geological as well as mining and technical conditions. Particular attention is paid to analyzing the feasibility of using the open-pit area as the main access element for the development of contour and off-contour reserves. It is shown that the use of the pit space for locating access workings and ore transportation makes it possible to reduce the volume of capital mine workings, shorten the time required to bring reserves into operation, and improve the economic efficiency of combined mining.

The study provides a comparative analysis of possible technological access schemes depending on the spatial position of reserves relative to pit elements, their depth of occurrence, and the adopted transportation system. Various options for accessing contour and off-contour reserves using shafts, inclined and horizontal workings, as well as the open-pit area, are developed and systematized. For each option, areas of rational application are identified with due regard to mining and geological conditions, pit parameters, and safety requirements. The obtained results can be applied in the design and optimization of access systems for ore deposits developed by open–underground mining methods in mountainous regions.

PDF (Uzbek)

References

1.Chung, J., Asad, M. W. A., & Topal, E. (2022). Timing of transition from open-pit to underground mining: A simultaneous optimisation model. Resources Policy, 77, 102632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102632

2.Ross, I. T., & Stewart, C. A. (2020). Issues with transitioning from open pits to underground caving mines. In MassMin 2020 Proceedings (pp. 221–238). https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2063_11

3.Tadjiev, S., & Sharopov, E. (2024). Assessment and selection of a rational option for the opening of near-contour reserves during open-underground mining of upland deposits. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 525). EDP Sciences.

4.Li, S., Su, W., Yin, T., Dan, Z., & Peng, K. (2025). Research progress and typical case of open-pit to underground mining in China. Applied Sciences, 15(15), 8530. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158530.

5.Tadjiev, S. (2024). Classification of reserves of upland ore deposits developed by the open-underground method. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 525). EDP Sciences.

6.Chen, S., Zhao, G., & Wang, J. (2023). Geomechanical assessment of crown pillar stability during transition from open-pit to underground mining. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 33(1), 123–135.

7.Zhou, Y., Liu, H., & Zhang, W. (2024). Integrated planning for open-pit to underground transition using numerical modelling. Mining Technology, 133(2), 78–92.

8.Jabinpour, A., & Shahriar, K. (2025). Production scheduling for sublevel caving using linear optimization. Journal of Mining and Environment, 16(1), 55–69.

9.Badakhshan, N., Afraei, S., & Bakhtavar, E. (2024). Environmental-cost based optimisation of open-pit to underground transition. Resources Policy, 95, 105178.

10. Мислибаев И.., Алимов Ш. М., Туйчиеваа Д.И. Экспериментальные исследования прочности свойств закладочных смесей с использованием отходов мраморного производства и угольной золы. ISSN 0017-2278 Горный журнал, 2025, № 10. –С. 41-44.

11.Xu, P., Li, W., & Sun, X. (2023). Numerical modelling of rock mass behaviour in deep ore bodies during transition mining. Engineering Geology, 317, 107120.

12.Gao, Q., Wen, Y., & Luo, R. (2021). Evaluation of haulage systems for deep underground–open pit hybrid mines. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 108, 103722.

13.Rakhmangulov, A., Burmistrov, K., & Osintsev, N. (2022). Selection of sustainable open-pit mining strategies based on MCDM. Sustainability, 14(13), 8003. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138003.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Misliboev, I.T., Mutavaliev, A.T., Tadjiyev, Sh.T. (Muallif)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.